Comments on: Thanks Ashford

By: johninho

johninho — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:56:12 +0000

haaa its the post…cant believe this…the article was getting negative all the way till i checked the author, as usual?
there is so much negativity from this tabloid, plse zamfoot dont them quote we are tired of the negativity..
Personally i still have a copy of kalus speech on the said topic, it was a good speech, i cant see what the educated Mukoka is talking about. anyway by his standards rating is a very big issue especially if from his beater. Mukoka hasnt recovered from the concusion he suffered when he was hammered in the face in SA, i can give him a free mental assessment.

By: Ku ma final

Ku ma final — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:26:45 +0000

Matafwali : In as much as one may question and have issues with the way the Post approaches and presents its stories, one can just not dismiss the allegations they are raising. One presenting before Parliament, I would think that you are under oath just as in court, and so when you make false or exaggerated presentations, there have to be some repercussions. When Kalu, during the unveiling of the new kit talked about how highly rated FAZ was in the estimation of FIFA, even I was thrown aback as I was at a loss to figure out what the basis of that rating is. Taking the saga of the transfers that dogs football house, one has to wonder what criteria FIFA used or what it was that they were actually rating the association on. Like everyone else, I would like to see our game improve, but that has to begin with the association that needs to put the interests of the game ahead of their own interests.

Which experts! Simata mwebantu? Why was he reliefed of his job at Finance Bank...

By: kayula

kayula — Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:03:59 +0000

Misleading a parliamentary committee by design or otherwise is a serious offence. If at all that is what happened, i see the SC been summoned again by the same committee and or they might recommend a serious penalty him.

By: Matafwali

Matafwali — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:35:37 +0000

In as much as one may question and have issues with the way the Post approaches and presents its stories, one can just not dismiss the allegations they are raising. One presenting before Parliament, I would think that you are under oath just as in court, and so when you make false or exaggerated presentations, there have to be some repercussions. When Kalu, during the unveiling of the new kit talked about how highly rated FAZ was in the estimation of FIFA, even I was thrown aback as I was at a loss to figure out what the basis of that rating is. Taking the saga of the transfers that dogs football house, one has to wonder what criteria FIFA used or what it was that they were actually rating the association on. Like everyone else, I would like to see our game improve, but that has to begin with the association that needs to put the interests of the game ahead of their own interests.

By: Mpongo

Mpongo — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:10:50 +0000

Jimmy :Did Arshford Mamelodi not mention that dispite FIFA not having a system of ranking associations, they still acknowledged the progress and the potential that FAZ has shown.So why must Mukoka only concetrate on one line materials. Lets get rid of theses secondary school debates and reports and rather focus on issues that will bring development. The pursuit of mistakes from individuals will not take us anywhere but really compromise the perception of our media. Kalusha state in his state of Faz address when anvailing the jersey, that FAZ would take responsibility in seeing the players` movement and performance outside the national team in order to see the steady growth of soccer. Why therefore, must we see it as KALUSHA intervention and not as FAZ dedication to the growth of soccer. Grudges will not take us anywhere.

Jimmy, I think you are out of touch and do not understand the depth of how FAZ is meddling into football development. Kalu can not be everything in life and he should let experts do their job.

By: Jimmy

Jimmy — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:59:56 +0000

Did Arshford Mamelodi not mention that dispite FIFA not having a system of ranking associations, they still acknowledged the progress and the potential that FAZ has shown.
So why must Mukoka only concetrate on one line materials. Lets get rid of theses secondary school debates and reports and rather focus on issues that will bring development. The pursuit of mistakes from individuals will not take us anywhere but really compromise the perception of our media.

Kalusha state in his state of Faz address when anvailing the jersey, that FAZ would take responsibility in seeing the players` movement and performance outside the national team in order to see the steady growth of soccer. Why therefore, must we see it as KALUSHA intervention and not as FAZ dedication to the growth of soccer. Grudges will not take us anywhere.

By: Jeremiah

Jeremiah — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:23:42 +0000

chimfwembe : zambian football is all comedy…we seriously dnt have any competent person to run the FA?..god help us

i totally agree with you,i find the post filled with biased reporters who target individuals to sale there paper.These diploma holders are nt ethical and its unfortunate we view them on dis site.I find this administration doing well so far apart frm a few mistakes bt look at da bigger picture,zambia is progressing football wise.Shame the post!

By: Winston

Winston — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:27:24 +0000

Its pity that instead of having a SWOT analysis per previous AFCON, as usual Zambian way of PHD is prevailing! I really feel very sorry that highly learned people can actually be the one in the front of mud-slidding to friends! I wonder where have we gone wrong with this scandolous reporting, mispresentation! Is it the freeness of our modern life that ther is no confidentiality to our managing of organisations? I bet if remain the way we are I can assure everyone that we gonna go two steps backward! FAZ through the executive must appraise every staff and certainly under-performance for a public office is unacceptable! But as we head for AGM let us put our heads to focus on how we improve our football, is it National League! On National League, I feel as Zambians we must all be the first ones to know the bottlenecks before targeting at Kalu or GS blocking everything! For what material benefit anyway!! The fact is most Zambian clubs have no viable operating offices where as stakeholders can acquint ourselves! Say players registered, club history, or trophies let alone web site for cyber communication! For that let us be realistic when we blame Kalu or GS and certainly I do not belief most reporting about these officers! Some scribes are targeting bringing down this executive come what may! This is dertrimental to Zambian football because instead of ‘selling’ our players in our writing, always its FAZ!!!! Gentlemen, PHD is for unschooled! If you have solutions to current standards, why dont you prepare a manual for all of us to learn from than having hundreds of hate articles!

By: chimfwembe

chimfwembe — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 10:10:53 +0000

zambian football is all comedy…we seriously dnt have any competent person to run the FA?..god help us